SSB Group Planning Exercise (GPE) — Model, Written Plan & Group Discussion
What is the Group Planning Exercise?
GPE is the second GTO task on Day 3, done right after the GD. The GTO reads out a scenario — usually a group is travelling somewhere and simultaneously encounters 3 or 4 emergencies (an injured man, a runaway child, a bank robbery, a train that must be caught). A 3D model of the area is placed in front of you with roads, villages, a river, a bridge and distances marked.
The 5-stage format
GPE runs in a fixed sequence — knowing the exact timings prevents panic:
- Stage 1 — GTO reads the story twice and points out the model (~5 min).
- Stage 2 — Individual reading of the printed narrative (~5 min).
- Stage 3 — Individual written plan on paper — everyone writes silently (~10 min).
- Stage 4 — Group discussion to arrive at one common plan (~15 min).
- Stage 5 — One nominated candidate narrates the final common plan (~5 min).
The priority-matrix method for stage 3
The biggest scoring lever is Stage 3 — your individual written plan. Do NOT try to solve all four problems in narrative form. Instead, in 10 minutes, produce a table like this:
- Row per problem — Injured man / Runaway child / Bank robbery / Missed train
- Column A — Priority (1 = most urgent life-threat, 4 = least)
- Column B — Who handles it (name / sub-group)
- Column C — Route on the model (bridge → village A → hospital)
- Column D — Resource used (jeep / motorcycle / on-foot)
- Column E — Time estimate
Priority principles the assessors reward
GPE plans are graded on how well you prioritise, not on cleverness:
- Life-threat before property-threat — the injured man before the bank robbery.
- Nearest resource for nearest problem — never route the jeep across the whole map.
- Split the group intelligently — one sub-group per problem, never send everyone to one place.
- Assume realistic speeds — 40 km/h by jeep on kaccha road, 5 km/h on foot.
- End with a rendezvous plan — where the group meets up after the emergencies are resolved.
How to behave in Stage 4 (group discussion)
Do not simply read your plan aloud — the GTO already has your written sheet. Instead, listen to two or three others first, note who has a similar approach to yours, then propose the shared framework and add your differentiators. The candidate who helps the group converge on ONE plan (rather than winning their own) is scored highest on Cooperation and Ability to Influence.
What common story means
In Stage 5, one candidate — usually volunteered — narrates the group's final plan. This is not automatic promotion for the narrator; the GTO scores whether the plan actually reflects the group's discussion. If your group failed to converge, an honest "we reached two versions" narration is better than a fabricated consensus.
Do & Don't — Quick Reference
Step-by-step: how to attempt Group Planning Exercise (GPE)
Read the model as carefully as the story
Note the scale, distances, road types, river bridges. Half of GPE is geography.
Rank the problems in 60 seconds
Life-threat first, property-threat next, avoidable inconveniences last.
Draft as a priority table, not a paragraph
Rows = problems, columns = priority / who / route / resource / time. Cleaner to grade.
Enter Stage 4 as a listener first
Listen for 60 seconds, spot who agrees with you, then propose the shared framework.
Help the group converge, do not dominate
The candidate who steers the group to one plan scores highest on Cooperation and Influence.
Frequently asked questions
How long is the SSB Group Planning Exercise (GPE)?
About 45 minutes end-to-end — 5 minutes for the GTO to read the story and explain the model, 5 minutes of individual reading, 10 minutes of silent written planning, 15 minutes of group discussion, and 5 minutes for one nominated candidate to narrate the final plan.
Should I try to solve all GPE problems or prioritise?
Prioritise ruthlessly. Life-threat problems (injury, drowning, medical emergency) come before property-threat (robbery, damage), which come before inconveniences (missed train, delayed meeting). Splitting the group across problems in parallel is expected — never send everyone to the biggest emergency.
Can I write my GPE plan as a paragraph instead of a table?
A table format (priority · who handles it · route on the model · resource used · time estimate) is faster for the GTO to grade and shows clearer organising ability. Long paragraphs get skimmed and the priority signal gets lost.
Does the GPE narrator score higher automatically?
No. The GTO scores whether the narration accurately reflects the group's discussion. Volunteering to narrate is a small positive, but a fabricated "consensus" narration hurts more than admitting the group reached two versions.
Related SSB preparation
Also preparing for the Day-2 written battery?
Start free TAT simulator →